FRANKLIN COVEY CO.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

        Franklin Covey Co. (the “Company”) provides integrated training and performance enhancement solutions to organizations and individuals in productivity, leadership, sales, communication, and other areas. Each integrated solution may include components of training and consulting, assessment, and other application tools that are generally available in electronic or paper-based formats. The Company’s products and services are available through professional consulting services, public workshops, retail stores, catalogs, and the Internet at www.franklincovey.com. The Company’s best-known offerings include the Franklin Covey Planner^TM, the productivity workshop entitled “Focus: Achieving Your Highest Priorities,” and courses based on the best-selling book, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People.

        The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to these interim financial reporting rules and regulations. The information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated.

        The Company utilizes a modified 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on August 31 of each year. Corresponding quarterly periods generally consist of 13-week periods that end on November 29, 2003, February 28, 2004, and May 29, 2004 during fiscal 2004. Under the modified 52/53-week fiscal year, the quarter and two quarters ended February 28, 2004 had the same number of business days as the quarter and two quarters ended March 1, 2003.

        The results of operations for the quarter and two quarters ended February 28, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the entire fiscal year ending August 31, 2004.

NOTE 2 – ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

        The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation and awards using the intrinsic-value method of accounting as outlined in Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25 and related interpretations. Under the intrinsic-value methodology, no compensation expense is recognized for stock option awards granted at, or above, the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for the Company’s stock option plans or employee stock purchase plan in its condensed consolidated statements of operations. Had compensation expense for the Company’s stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan been determined in accordance with the fair value approach as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company’s net loss attributable to common shareholders and corresponding basic and diluted loss per share would have been the following (in thousands, except per share data):

        During January 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a restricted stock award (the “RSA”) that granted 303,660 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain individuals in the Company’s management. The restricted stock shares vest five years from the grant date and may vest on an accelerated basis if the Company achieves specified earnings levels during fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005. The compensation cost of the RSA was based on the fair value of the shares on the grant date and totaled $0.8 million, which was recorded as deferred compensation in shareholders’ equity. The compensation cost related to the RSA will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the shares and will be accelerated if the Company achieves the specified earnings thresholds. In connection with the RSA grant, the participants are eligible to receive a cash bonus for a portion of the income taxes resulting from the grant. The participants received their cash bonus at the time of grant or will receive their bonus when the RSA shares vest. The cash bonuses totaled $0.4 million, of which $0.2 million was paid and expensed at the grant date. The remaining $0.2 million will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, subject to acceleration if necessary. The RSA shares granted were issued from treasury stock and had a cost basis of $5.2 million. The difference between the fair value of the RSA shares granted and their cost, which totaled $4.4 million, was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.

NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method and were comprised of the following (in thousands):

NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        The Company’s intangible assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):

        The Company’s aggregate amortization expense totaled $1.0 million and $1.2 million for the quarters ended February 28, 2004 and March 1, 2003. Total amortization expense for the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 and March 1, 2003 was $2.1 million and $2.3 million.

NOTE 5 – MANAGEMENT COMMON STOCK LOAN PROGRAM

        The Company is the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to allow certain management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The loan program closed during fiscal 2001 with 3,825,000 shares of common stock purchased by the loan participants for a total cost of $33.6 million. The loans in the management stock loan program accrue interest at 9.4 percent (compounded quarterly), are full-recourse to the participants, and are recorded as a reduction to shareholders’ equity in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Although interest accrues against the participants over the life of the loans, the Company ceased recording interest receivable (and related interest income) related to these loans during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. However, loan participants remain obligated to pay all accrued interest upon maturity of the loans, which occurs in March 2005. As of February 28, 2004, the total outstanding loans and recorded accrued interest receivable was $37.3 million and the carrying value of these outstanding loans and interest totaled $7.6 million.

        The Company utilizes a systematic methodology for determining the level of loan loss reserves that are appropriate for the management common stock loan program. A key factor considered by the methodology is the current market value of the common stock acquired and held by the participants. Other factors considered by the methodology include: the liquid net worth of the participants; the risks of pursuing collection actions against key employees; the probability of sufficient participant repayment capability based upon proximity to the due date of the loans; and other business, economic, and participant factors which may have an impact on the Company’s ability to collect the loans. Additionally, the methodology takes into account the fact that the Company does not hold the participants’ shares of stock as collateral due to certain laws and regulations. Based upon the reserve methodology, which includes management’s judgments regarding the adequacy of the management loan loss reserve, the Company did not record an increase or decrease to the loan loss reserve during the quarter ended February 28, 2004. The Company had aggregate loan loss reserves totaling $29.7 million at February 28, 2004 and August 31, 2003, which reduced notes and interest receivable from financing common stock purchases by related parties in the respective condensed consolidated balance sheets. At February 28, 2004, the principal amount of the participants’ loans plus recorded accrued interest exceeded the market value of the common stock acquired by the participants by $26.8 million. Should the value of the common stock acquired by the participants continue to be insufficient to cover the loans outstanding during the loan term, the loan loss reserve methodology provides a basis to be fully reserved for the difference between the value of the loans outstanding and the market value of the acquired stock, plus estimated collection and other related costs, prior to the March 2005 maturity date of the loans. The inability of the Company to collect all, or a portion, of these receivables could have an adverse impact upon its financial position and future cash flows compared to full collection of the loans.

        The establishment of reserves for potential management stock loan losses requires significant estimates and judgment by the Company’s management. These estimates and projections are subject to change as a result of various economic and market factors, most of which are not within the Company’s control. As a result, the reserve for management stock loan losses could fluctuate significantly in future periods.

NOTE 6 – RESTRUCTURING AND STORE CLOSURE COSTS

        During fiscal 2003 and the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, the Company closed certain retail stores and incurred severance and lease termination costs related to the closure of these stores. These severance and lease termination costs are reported as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

        During fiscal 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan to restructure the Company’s operations, reduce its workforce, and formally exit the majority of the Company’s leased office space located in Provo, Utah. The Company recorded a $16.3 million restructuring charge during fiscal 1999 to record the expected costs of these activities. Included in the restructuring charge were costs to provide severance and related benefits, as well as expected costs to formally exit the leased office space. This restructuring plan was substantially completed during fiscal 2000 and remaining restructuring costs at February 28, 2004 consist of leased space exit costs.

        The components of the remaining restructuring and store closure accruals at February 28, 2004 were as follows (in thousands):

        The remaining accrued leased space exit costs represent the difference between base rental charges and offsetting expected sublease receipts on these properties. During the quarter ended February 28, 2004 the Company accrued and expensed $0.2 million of additional leased space exit costs related to changes in estimated sublease receipts on 2 retail store closures that occurred during fiscal 2003. Approximately $2.2 million of the accrued leased space exit costs at February 28, 2004 is due to be paid subsequent to August 31, 2004. Although the Company expects that the accrual will be sufficient to exit these leased properties, changes in the commercial real estate market, which are impacted by numerous elements that are not within the control of the Company, may require further adjustments to the accrual.

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

        During the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, the Company consumed its remaining retained earnings and reported an accumulated deficit on its condensed consolidated balance sheet. Based upon applicable accounting guidelines, the Company ceased recording preferred dividends against retained earnings when it was exhausted and recorded a portion of the preferred dividends for the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES

        Although the Company recognized consolidated pre-tax losses during the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 and March 1, 2003, the Company recorded income tax expense during those periods that totaled $1.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The Company’s income tax expense during these periods was primarily due to taxable income in certain foreign tax jurisdictions. The Company was unable to offset the tax liabilities in these jurisdictions with its domestic operating loss carryforwards. A recent history of significant operating losses has precluded the Company from demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the benefits of domestic operating loss carryforwards, together with the benefits of other deferred income tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has recorded valuation allowances on its domestic deferred income tax assets at February 28, 2004 and August 31, 2003.

NOTE 9 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

        Comprehensive income (loss) includes charges and credits to equity accounts that are not the result of transactions with shareholders. Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income and loss items and was comprised of the following (in thousands):

NOTE 10 – NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

        Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock method or the “as converted” method, as appropriate. During periods of net loss, all common stock equivalents, including the effect of common shares from the issuance of preferred stock on an “as converted” basis, are excluded from the diluted EPS calculation.

        Due to their anti-dilutive effect, the following incremental shares from Series A preferred stock calculated on an “as converted” basis and the potential common stock equivalents resulting from options to purchase common stock and non-vested shares of restricted stock deferred compensation that were calculated using the treasury stock method have been excluded from the diluted EPS calculation (in thousands):

        At February 28, 2004, the Company had approximately 2,750,000 stock options outstanding and 303,660 shares of non-vested restricted common stock that may have a dilutive effect on the Company’s EPS calculation in future periods.

NOTE 11 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

        The Company has two reporting segments: the Consumer Business Unit (“CBU”) and the Organizational Solutions Business Unit (“OSBU”). The following is a description of the Company’s reporting segments, their primary operating components, and their significant business activities:

        The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and each of the reportable segments has a president who reports directly to the CEO. The primary measurement tool used for internal business unit performance analysis is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”), which may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled amounts are calculated by other companies. For segment reporting purposes, the Company’s consolidated EBITDA can be calculated as its income or loss from operations excluding depreciation and amortization charges.

        In the normal course of business, the Company may make structural and cost allocation revisions to its segment information to reflect new reporting responsibilities within the organization. All prior period segment information has been revised to conform to the most recent classifications and organizational changes. The Company accounts for its segment information on the same basis as the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

        A reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes is provided below (in thousands):

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        Management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based upon management’s current expectations and are subject to various uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements are set forth below under the heading Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

        The Company suggests that the following discussion and analysis be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2003.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

        The quarter ended February 28, 2004 marked our sixth consecutive quarter of improved quarter-over-quarter operating results. We recognized net income of $0.2 million for the quarter ended February 28, 2004 compared to a net loss of $7.9 million in the same period of the prior year. Our results of operations for the quarter were primarily influenced by the following factors: 1) Sales decreased by $11.1 million compared to the same period of the prior year and these declines were experienced in both the Consumer Business Unit (“CBU”) and the Organizational Solutions Business Unit (“OSBU”). However, the impact of declining sales was partially offset by improved gross margins for both product and training sales; 2) Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased by $6.5 million and other operating expenses, including the provision for losses on the management stock loan program and asset impairments, decreased by $2.4 million; 3) Depreciation expense decreased by $4.8 million; and 4) Income tax expense increased by $0.3 million due to profitable international operations. Our cash position remained strong at $40.4 million and our net working capital totaled $41.7 million at February 28, 2004. Further details regarding these factors and their impact on our operating results are provided throughout the following management’s discussion and analysis.

Quarter Ended February 28, 2004 Compared to the Quarter Ended March 1, 2003

Sales

        The following table sets forth sales data for our operating segments (in thousands):

        Product sales, which primarily consist of planners, binders, software, and handheld electronic planning devices that are primarily sold through our CBU channels, declined $7.9 million, or 12 percent compared to the second quarter of the prior fiscal year. The decline in product sales was primarily due to decreased sales in our retail and catalog channels. However, these declines were partially offset by increased sales from our eCommerce and wholesale channels. Retail store sales decreased by $7.7 million, or 19 percent, compared to the prior year. Reduced retail sales were primarily attributable to closed stores, a significant decline in the technology product sales, and reduced traffic in our remaining stores. These factors were reflected in an 8 percent decline in comparable store sales when measured against the prior year. During the quarter ended February 28, 2004, we closed 7 retail stores that had $1.1 million of sales during the quarter ended March 1, 2003. We currently expect to close 3 additional stores through the end of fiscal 2004 and we may close additional retail stores in future periods if analysis demonstrates that our operating performance may be improved through further retail store closures. We anticipate that a portion of the sales from these closed stores will transition to other retail store locations or to one of our other product channels. At February 28, 2004, we were operating 144 domestic retail stores compared to 171 domestic and 10 international retail locations at March 1, 2003. Catalog sales declined $1.6 million, compared to fiscal 2003, reflecting previous trends of lower call volume through our catalog call center. Lower call volume through our catalog channel is partially the result of fewer catalog mailings and our initiative to encourage customers to order through our eCommerce site located at www.franklincovey.com. Decreased catalog sales were partially offset by increased traffic and sales volume through our eCommerce channel, a trend that we expect to continue in future periods. Other CBU channel sales, which includes the sale of products through large retail chains, office superstores, and governmental channels decreased primarily due to the outsourcing of governmental product sales. During fiscal 2004 we outsourced the sale and distribution of our products through government channels to a well-established office products distributor. Accordingly, we now recognize royalty income from the distributor rather than the net sale and corresponding costs related to those sales. This change in strategy has resulted in overall improved income from product sales through government channels. The decline in governmental channel sales was partially offset by increased sales of our products in office superstores and through other retail chains.

        The Company offers a variety of training solutions, training related products, and consulting services focused on productivity, leadership, sales performance, and communication training programs that are provided both domestically and internationally through the OSBU. Training solution and related services sales, which are primarily delivered by the OSBU, decreased by $3.2 million, or 13 percent, compared to the quarter ended March 1, 2003. The decline in training sales was primarily due to decreased domestic leadership and productivity training program sales, which are delivered through our Organizational Sales Group (“OSG”). These declines were experienced to various extents across all of our primary delivery methods, including client-facilitated programs, public programs, and on-site programs. The Company’s continued efforts to scale back organizational consulting and the number of public seminars offered, while focusing more of our efforts on organizational training solutions also contributed to the overall decline in sales. Partially offsetting these declines was increased sales of our new 4 Disciplines of Execution and xQ programs. We believe that OSG training and service sales will improve as the general economy and hiring trends improve in the United States, corporate clients restore funding to training budgets, and as our new training offerings gain traction in the market. However, there can be no certainty as to when, or if, these events may occur and what their impact might be upon our training sales trends.

        International sales, which are reported as a component of our OSBU segment, increased $2.4 million, or 24 percent, compared to the prior year. The increase in international sales was primarily due to the translation of foreign sales amounts as foreign currencies strengthened against the United States dollar and by increased sales in Japan, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Mexico. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange fluctuations, international sales grew 11 percent compared to the prior year.

Gross Margin

        Gross margin consists of net sales less the cost of goods sold or services provided. Our overall gross margin improved to 56.7 percent of sales for the quarter, compared to 55.8 percent in the comparable quarter of fiscal 2003. The improvement in our overall gross margin was primarily due to favorable factors affecting our gross margin on product sales, which improved to 52.8 percent compared to 52.0 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The improvement in our product gross margin was primarily due to a shift in our product mix toward increased paper and binder sales, which have higher gross margins than technology and specialty items, focused cost reduction efforts that improved our gross margins in virtually all of our product categories, outsourcing of our product sales through government channels as described above, and decreased product obsolescence charges. Consistent with our quarter ended November 29, 2003, paper and binder sales continue to increase as a percent of total sales and were up approximately six percent compared to the prior year. We believe that such changes in our product mix, combined with continued aggressive cost management, will continue to produce favorable results in our product sales gross margin when compared to the prior year.

        Training solution and related services gross margin, as a percent of sales, improved to 66.9 percent compared to 65.6 percent in the prior year. The improvement in our training gross margin was primarily due to ongoing initiatives designed to reduce training program delivery costs and to de-emphasize organizational consulting sales, which have lower margins than the majority of our other training programs and services.

Operating Expenses

        Selling, General and Administrative – Our selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses decreased $6.5 million, or 14 percent, compared to the prior year. Declining SG&A expenses were the direct result of initiatives specifically designed to reduce our overall operating costs and were consistent with SG&A expense trends during the previous two fiscal years. Our cost-reduction efforts have included retail store closures, headcount reductions, consolidation of corporate office space, and other measures designed to focus our resources on critical activities and projects. The primary effects of these cost-cutting initiatives were reflected in associate expense reductions totaling $3.0 million, advertising and promotional expense reductions totaling $1.8 million, and reductions in other SG&A expenses, such as outsourcing and development costs, that totaled $1.8 million compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting these cost reduction efforts were $0.6 million of additional expenses related to retail store closures, as discussed below. With the annualization of previous cost reduction efforts and continuing initiatives to further reduce our operating expenses, the Company expects that SG&A expenses will continue to decrease, compared to the prior year, through the remainder of fiscal 2004.

        We regularly assess the operating performance of our retail stores, including previous operating performance trends and projected future profitability. During this assessment process, judgments are made as to whether under-performing or unprofitable stores should be closed. As a result of this evaluation process, we decided to close certain stores during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004. These store closures are comprised of stores that were unprofitable or were located in markets where the Company has multiple retail locations. The costs associated with closing retail stores are typically comprised of charges related to vacating the premises, which may include a provision for the remaining term on the lease, and severance and other personnel costs. During the quarter ended February 28, 2004 we closed 7 retail stores and incurred additional expenses related to certain store closures that occurred during fiscal 2003. These store closure costs totaled $0.6 million for the quarter ended February 28, 2004 and were reported as a component of SG&A expenses. Based upon our continuing analyses of retail store performance, we also intend to close 3 additional retail stores through the end of fiscal 2004, and will continue to incur costs associated with closing these stores.

        Provision for Losses on Management Common Stock Program – We utilize a systematic methodology for determining the level of loan loss reserves that are appropriate for the management common stock loan program (See Note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). Based upon this methodology, which includes management’s judgments regarding the adequacy of the loan loss reserve, we did not record an adjustment to the loan loss reserve during the quarter ended February 28, 2004. We recorded a $2.3 million increase in the loan loss reserve during the comparable quarter of the prior year.

        Should the value of the common stock acquired by the participants continue to be insufficient to cover the loans outstanding during the loan term, the loan loss reserve methodology provides a basis to be fully reserved for the difference between the value of the loans outstanding and the market value of the acquired stock, plus estimated collection and other related costs, prior to the March 2005 maturity date of the loans. The inability of the Company to collect all, or a portion, of these receivables could have an adverse impact upon our financial position and future cash flows compared to full collection of the loans. The establishment of reserves for potential management stock loan losses requires significant estimates and judgment by our management. These estimates and projections are subject to change as a result of various economic and market factors, most of which are not within our control. As a result, the reserve for management stock loan losses could fluctuate significantly in future periods.

        Recovery of Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiary – During fiscal 2001, we entered into a joint venture agreement with American Marketing Systems (“AMS”) to form Franklin Covey Coaching, LLC (“FCC”). Due to events and circumstances that suggested the joint venture would be terminated, we recorded impairment charges totaling $16.3 million to our investment in FCC during fiscal 2002. AMS later exercised its option to terminate the previous joint venture agreement effective August 31, 2002. According to the terms of a new agreement that terminated our interest in FCC in October 2003, we received payments totaling $2.6 million, of which $2.0 million was received during the quarter ended March 1, 2003. Upon recognition of these payments, we first reduced our remaining investment in FCC at August 31, 2002 to zero and then recorded the additional amounts as reversals of the previously recorded impairment charges. The impairment reversals during the quarter ended March 1, 2003 totaled $0.7 million and were recorded as a recovery of investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary.

        Depreciation and Amortization – Depreciation expense decreased $4.8 million, or 60 percent, compared to the prior year primarily due to the prior year impairment of retail store assets, full depreciation or disposal of certain computer hardware and software assets, and the effects of significantly reduced capital expenditures during preceding fiscal years. Based upon these events and current capital spending trends, we expect that depreciation expense will continue to decline compared to prior periods during the remainder of fiscal 2004. Amortization expense on definite-lived intangible assets totaled $1.0 million for the quarter ended February 28, 2004, compared to $1.2 million in the prior year. The reduction in our amortization expense is due to the full amortization of certain definite-lived intangible assets.

Income Taxes

        The provision for income taxes increased to $0.8 million compared to $0.5 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increased taxable income in certain foreign tax jurisdictions. As of February 28, 2004, given our recent history of significant operating losses, we had provided a valuation allowance against substantially all of our domestic deferred income tax assets.

Two Quarters Ended February 28, 2004 Compared to the Two Quarters Ended March 1, 2003

Sales

        Product sales, which primarily occur through our CBU channels, declined $13.7 million, or 11 percent compared to the prior year. The decline in product sales was primarily attributable to decreased sales in our retail and catalog channels. However, decreased sales in these channels were partially offset by increased sales from our eCommerce and wholesale channels. Retail store sales decreased by $13.2 million, or 19 percent, compared to the prior year. Reduced retail sales were primarily attributable to closed stores, a significant decline in the technology product sales, and reduced traffic in our remaining stores. These factors were reflected in a 9 percent decline in comparable store sales when measured against the prior year. During the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, we closed 9 retail stores that had $2.4 million of sales during the two quarters ended March 1, 2003. Catalog sales declined compared to fiscal 2003, reflecting previous trends of lower call volume through our catalog call center. Decreased catalog sales were partially offset by increased traffic and sales volume through our eCommerce website at www.franklincovey.com.

        Training solution and related services sales decreased by $7.4 million, or 14 percent, compared to the prior year. The decline in training sales was reflective of recent training program sales trends and was primarily due to decreased training program sales in the United States, which are delivered through our Organizational Sales Group. The decrease in OSG sales was primarily attributable to decreased leadership and productivity training programs that were experienced to various extents across all of our primary delivery methods, including client-facilitated programs, public programs, and on-site programs. Partially offsetting these declines was increased sales of our new 4 Disciplines of Execution and xQ programs, which were released near the beginning of fiscal 2004.

        International sales for the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 increased $3.8 million, or 17 percent, compared to the prior year. The increase in international sales was primarily due to the translation of foreign sales amounts as foreign currencies strengthened against the United States dollar and by increased sales in Japan, the United Kingdom, Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Increased sales in these countries were partially offset by sales decreases at our European office. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange fluctuations, international sales grew 6 percent compared to the prior year.

Gross Margin

        Our overall gross margin for the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, improved to 56.7 percent of sales, compared to 55.5 percent for the two quarters ended March 1, 2003. The improvement in our overall gross margin was primarily due to favorable factors affecting our gross margin on product sales, which improved to 52.6 percent compared to 51.1 percent in the prior year. The improvement in our product gross margin reflects continuing trends of a shift in our product mix toward increased paper and binder product sales, which have higher gross margins than technology and specialty items, focused cost reduction efforts that improved margins in virtually all of our product categories, and decreased obsolescence charges. During the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, paper and binder product sales, as a percentage of total product sales, increased by approximately six percent compared to fiscal 2003. In addition, the overall margin on paper and binder sales has increased, primarily due to reduced material costs and other cost reduction initiatives, compared to the prior year.

        Training solution and related services gross margin, as a percent of sales, improved to 66.6 percent compared to 65.8 percent in the prior year. The improvement in our training gross margin was primarily due to ongoing initiatives designed to reduce training program delivery costs and decreased organizational consulting sales, which had lower margins than the majority of our other training programs and services.

Operating Expenses

        Selling, General and Administrative – Our SG&A expenses decreased $14.4 million, or 15 percent, compared to the prior year. Declining SG&A expenses were the direct result of initiatives specifically designed to reduce our overall operating costs and were consistent with SG&A expense trends during the previous two fiscal years. The primary benefits of these cost-cutting initiatives were reflected in associate expense reductions totaling $7.6 million, advertising and promotional expense reductions totaling $4.6 million, and reductions in other SG&A expenses, such as outsourcing and development costs, that totaled $3.7 million compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting these cost reduction efforts were $1.2 million of additional expenses related to retail store closures.

        As a result of a retail store evaluation process that includes analysis of previous operating performance trends and projected future profitability, we decided to close certain stores during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004. These store closures are comprised of stores that were unprofitable or were located in markets where the Company has multiple retail locations. The costs associated with closing retail stores are typically comprised of charges related to vacating the premises, severance, and other personnel costs. During the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 we closed 9 stores and incurred additional expenses related to certain store closures that occurred during fiscal 2003. These store closure costs totaled $1.2 million for the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 and were reported as a component of SG&A expense.

        Provision for Losses on Management Common Stock Program – We utilize a systematic methodology for determining the level of loan loss reserves that are appropriate for the management common stock loan program (See Note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). Based upon this methodology, which includes management’s judgments regarding the adequacy of the loan loss reserve, we did not record any adjustments to the loan loss reserve during the two quarters ended February 28, 2004. We recorded increases totaling $2.5 million to the loan loss reserve during the comparable two quarters of the prior year.

        Recovery of Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiary – During fiscal 2001, we entered into a joint venture agreement to form FCC. Due to events and circumstances that suggested the joint venture would be terminated, we recorded impairment charges totaling $16.3 million to our investment in FCC during fiscal 2002. According to the terms of a new agreement that terminated our interest in FCC in October 2003, we received payments totaling $2.6 million, of which $2.0 million was received during the two quarters ended March 1, 2003. Upon recognition of the payments, we first reduced our remaining investment in FCC at August 31, 2002 to zero and then recorded the additional amounts as reversals of the previously recorded impairment charges. The impairment reversals during the quarter ended March 1, 2003 resulting from the new agreement totaled $1.6 million and were recorded as a recovery of investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary.

        Depreciation and Amortization – Depreciation expense decreased $7.2 million, or 51 percent, compared to the two quarters ended March 1, 2003 primarily due to the prior year impairment of retail store assets, full depreciation or disposal of certain computer hardware and software assets, and the effects of significantly reduced capital expenditures during preceding fiscal years. Based upon these events and current capital asset spending trends, we expect that depreciation expense will continue to decline compared to prior periods during the remainder of fiscal 2004. Amortization expense on definite-lived intangible assets totaled $2.1 million for the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, compared to $2.3 million in the prior year. The reduction in our amortization expense is due to the full amortization of certain definite-lived intangible assets. We expect intangible asset amortization expense to total $4.2 million during fiscal 2004.

Income Taxes

        The provision for income taxes increased to $1.8 million compared to $1.2 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2003. The increase was primarily due to increased taxable income in certain foreign tax jurisdictions that could not be offset by domestic loss carryforwards or other tax assets. As of February 28, 2004, given our recent history of significant operating losses, we had provided a valuation allowance against substantially all of our domestic deferred income tax assets.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

        Historically, our primary sources of capital have been net cash provided by operating activities, line-of-credit financing, long-term borrowings, asset sales, and the issuance of preferred and common stock. Following repayment and termination of our line of credit facility in fiscal 2002, we have not sought to obtain a new credit facility. Consequently, we currently rely primarily upon cash flows from operating activities to maintain adequate liquidity and working capital levels. At February 28, 2004, we had $40.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, compared to $41.9 million at August 31, 2003. Our net working capital has increased to $41.7 million at February 28, 2004 compared to $38.5 million at August 31, 2003. The following discussion is a description of the primary factors affecting our cash flows during the two quarters ended February 28, 2004.

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

        During the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, our net cash provided by operating activities totaled $3.3 million. Our primary source of cash from operating activities was the sale of goods and services to our customers in the normal course of business. The primary uses of cash for operating activities are payments to suppliers for materials used in products sold, payments for direct costs necessary to conduct training programs, and payments for selling, general, and administrative expenses. Although our cash flows from operating activities were unfavorably affected by declining sales, we recognized improved overall cash flows from operating activities through reduced cash payments for costs and expenses related to generating these revenues, which was reflected by improved income from operations. In addition to these favorable operating results, we reduced our inventory levels to $26.8 million at February 28, 2004 from $36.8 million at August 31, 2003. In light of continuing sales trends, we have actively sought to improve our inventory levels through better management of on-hand inventories, especially for electronic devices, and overall reduced purchases. During the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, we also significantly reduced our payable to Electronic Data Systems (“EDS”) for accrued outsourcing contract costs. In fiscal 2003, we negotiated a revised payment schedule related to our outsourcing contracts with EDS for outstanding invoices from December 2002 through May 2003. These payments were postponed until certain software system implementation issues were resolved. As part of the revised payment schedule, we made $11.6 million of additional payments to EDS from September 2003 through February 2004 to bring us current on our liability with EDS. These payments were in addition to required minimum contract costs, as discussed in the Contractual Obligations section of this liquidity and capital resources discussion, and did not increase our costs of operations during fiscal 2004 since the obligations were expensed as they were incurred. The overall reduction in accrued outsourcing costs, accounts payable, which is seasonally high at August 31 of each year, and other accrued liabilities was $20.4 million and represented a significant use of cash during the first two quarters of fiscal 2004. We believe that efforts to optimize working capital balances combined with existing and planned cost-cutting initiatives, sales stabilization efforts, including new products and services, will improve our cash flows from operating activities in future periods. However, the success of these efforts is dependent upon numerous factors, some of which are not within our control.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities and Capital Expenditures

        During the two quarters ended February 28, 2004, we used net cash of $0.4 million for investing activities. We used $1.9 million of cash during these two quarters for purchases of property and equipment, which consisted primarily of manufacturing equipment at our paper planner manufacturing facility and computer software and hardware. Our primary source of cash from investing activities was the sale of a vacant manufacturing facility, which resulted in net cash proceeds to the Company of $1.5 million.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

        Net cash used for financing activities during the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 totaled $4.4 million. Our primary use of cash for financing activities was the payment of accrued Series A preferred stock dividends, which totaled $4.4 million during the two quarters ended February 28, 2004.

Contractual Obligations

        The Company has not structured any special purpose or variable interest entities, or participated in any commodity trading activities, which would expose us to potential undisclosed liabilities or create adverse consequences to our liquidity. Required contractual payments primarily consist of required payments to EDS for outsourcing services related to information systems, warehousing and distribution, and call center operations; rent expense for retail store and sales office space; cash payments for Series A preferred stock dividends; monitoring fees paid to a Series A preferred stock investor; and mortgage payments on certain buildings and property. Our expected payments on these obligations over the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

Other Items

        The Company is the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to allow certain management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock. These loans, which are full recourse to the participants, are recorded as a reduction to shareholders’ equity in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. For further information regarding our management common stock loan program, refer to Note 5 in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The inability of the Company to collect all, or a portion, of these receivables could have an adverse impact upon our financial position and future cash flows compared to full collection of the loans.

        Going forward, we will continue to incur costs necessary for the operation and potential growth of the business. We anticipate using cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities, on the condition that we can continue to generate positive cash flows from operations, and other financing alternatives, if necessary, for these expenditures. With significantly reduced debt balances, current levels of cash on hand, and expected improvements in cash flows from operating activities, we believe that our liquidity is adequate for the next twelve months. However, our ability to maintain adequate capital for our operations beyond that point in time is dependent upon a number of factors, including sales trends, our ability to contain costs, levels of capital expenditures, collection of accounts receivable, and other factors. Some of the factors that influence our operations are not within our control, such as economic conditions and the introduction of new technology and products by our competitors. We will continue to monitor our liquidity position and may pursue additional financing alternatives, including additional asset sales, to maintain sufficient resources for future operating and capital requirements. However, there can be no assurance such financing alternatives will be available to us on acceptable terms.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        Our condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Management regularly evaluates its estimates and assumptions and bases those estimates and assumptions on historical experience, factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, including changes in economic conditions and other circumstances that are not in our control, but which may have an impact on these estimates and our actual financial results.

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, 2) delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered, 3) the price to the customer is fixed and determinable, and 4) collectibility is reasonably assured. For product sales, these conditions are generally met upon shipment of the product to the customer or by completion of the sale transaction in a retail store. For training and service sales, these conditions are generally met upon presentation of the training seminar, delivery of the consulting services, or shipment of the training manuals and related products. Revenue is recognized on software sales in accordance with Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” For sales contracts that have been entered into after June 15, 2003 that contain multiple deliverables, each element of the contract is analyzed and treated as a separate earnings process if it meets the specified requirements of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” If those requirements are not met, revenue is determined for those combined deliverables as a single unit of accounting. Revenue from multiple deliverable contracts is recognized upon completion of the contracted terms for each element. Revenue is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts and product returns.

Inventory Valuation

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method. Our inventories are comprised primarily of dated calendar products and other non-dated products such as binders, handheld electronic devices, stationery, training products, and other accessories. Provision is made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable value. In assessing the realization of inventories, we make judgments regarding future demand requirements and compare these assessments with current and committed inventory levels. Inventory requirements may change based on projected customer demand, technological and product life cycle changes, longer or shorter than expected usage periods, and other factors that could affect the valuation of our inventories.

Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

        Intangible assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The Covey trade name intangible asset has been deemed to have an indefinite life. This intangible asset is assigned to the Organizational Solutions Business Unit and is tested for impairment using the present value of estimated royalties derived from trade name related revenues, which consist primarily of training seminars and related products. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our indefinite-lived intangible asset change in the future, significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        Long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate of undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets, over the remaining useful lives in determining whether the assets are recoverable. If the carrying values of the assets exceed the anticipated future cash flows of the assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying values of the assets and their estimated fair values. Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are independent from other groups of assets. The evaluation of long-lived assets requires us to use estimates of future cash flows. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our long-lived tangible and definite-lived intangible assets change in the future, significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Loan Loss Reserve for Management Common Stock Loan Program

        The Company is the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to allow certain management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock. These loans are full-recourse to the participants and are recorded as a reduction of shareholders’ equity in our consolidated balance sheets. In order to assess the net realizable value of these loans, we utilize a systematic methodology for determining the level of loan loss reserves that are appropriate for the management common stock loan program. A key factor considered by the methodology is the current market value of the common stock acquired by the participants. Other factors considered by the methodology include: the liquid net worth of the participants; the risks of pursuing collection actions against key employees; the probability of sufficient participant repayment capability based upon proximity to the due date of the loans; and other business, economic, and participant factors which may have an impact on our ability to collect the loans.

        We assess the adequacy of our loan loss reserve on a quarterly basis and adjust the allowance based upon the results of the assessment. Based upon the results of this assessment, we did not record an adjustment to our loan loss reserve during the quarter ended February 28, 2004. Our loan loss methodology takes into account the fact that the Company does not hold the participants’ shares of stock as collateral due to certain laws and regulations. Should the value of the common stock acquired by the participants continue to be insufficient to cover the loans outstanding during the loan term, our loan loss reserve methodology provides a basis to be fully reserved for the difference between the value of the loans outstanding and the market value of the acquired stock, plus estimated collection and other related costs, prior to the March 2005 maturity date of the loans.

Income Taxes

        The calculation of our income tax provision or benefit, as applicable, requires estimates of future taxable income or losses. During the course of the fiscal year, these estimates are compared to actual financial results and adjustments may be made to our tax provision or benefit to reflect these revised estimates.

        Our recent history of significant operating losses precludes us from demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the related benefits from deferred income tax deductions and foreign tax carryforwards will be realized. Accordingly, we recorded valuation allowances on our deferred income tax assets. These valuation allowances are based on estimates of future taxable income or losses that may or may not be realized.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

MARKET RISK OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

        The primary financial instrument risks to which the Company is exposed are fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage risks associated with foreign currency exchange and interest rates, we make limited use of derivative financial instruments. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from one or more underlying financial instruments. As a matter of policy, our derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions that are independent of those exposures. In addition, we do not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes, nor are we party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The notional amounts of derivatives do not represent actual amounts exchanged by the parties to the instrument, and, thus, are not a measure of exposure to us through our use of derivatives. Additionally, we enter into derivative agreements only with highly rated counterparties and we do not expect to incur any losses resulting from non-performance by other parties.

Foreign Currency Sensitivity

        Due to the global nature of the Company’s operations, we are involved in transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar, which creates exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. During the quarter and two quarters ended February 23, 2004, we utilized foreign currency forward contracts to manage the volatility of certain intercompany financing transactions and other transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts did not meet specific hedge accounting requirements and corresponding gains and losses on these contracts were recorded as a component of SG&A expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The settlement of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts resulted in net losses totaling $0.1 million and $0.5 million for the quarter and two quarters ended February 28, 2004 compared to net losses of $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal year. The notional amounts of the Company’s foreign currency contracts were as follows at February 28, 2004 (in thousands):

Interest Rate Sensitivity

        The Company is exposed to fluctuations in U.S. interest rates primarily as a result of the cash and cash equivalents that we hold. Following payment and termination of our line of credit facility during fiscal 2002, our remaining debt balances consist primarily of fixed-rate long-term mortgages on certain of our buildings and property. As such, the Company does not have significant exposure or additional liability due to interest rate sensitivity. Additionally, the Company was not party to any interest rate swap or other interest related derivative instrument during the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 or March 1, 2003.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)       Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

(b)      Changes in Internal Controls

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

        Certain written and oral statements made by the Company or our representatives in this report, other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases, conferences, Internet webcasts, or otherwise, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and may contain words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are disclosed from time to time in reports filed by us with the SEC, including reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following areas: the risk that our revenues will continue to decline; our ability to reduce costs sufficiently to permit profitable operations at reduced revenue levels; the ability to maintain revenues at a sufficient level to recognize anticipated benefits from the EDS outsourcing agreements; unanticipated costs or capital expenditures; changes in consumer preferences and difficulties in anticipating or forecasting changes in customer preferences or consumer demand for our products and services; difficulties encountered by EDS in implementing, operating, and maintaining our information systems and controls, including without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply planning, inventory control, and order fulfillment; delays or unanticipated outcomes relating to the Company’s strategic plans; availability of financing sources; dependence on existing products or services; the rate and consumer acceptance of new product introductions; competition; the number and nature of customers and their product orders, including changes in the timing or mix of product or training orders; pricing of our products and services and those of competitors; adverse publicity; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and other factors which may adversely affect our business.

        In recent periods, the Company has faced declining revenues. Our sales for the two quarters ended February 28, 2004 were $153.7 million compared to $174.8 million in the same period of the prior year. While we have substantially reduced our operating expenses, we have not returned to profitability. If our revenues continue to decline, we may be unable to reduce our operating expenses sufficiently to achieve profitable operations due to contractual obligations and other fixed costs of our business.

        While the Company has a broad customer base, we are also subject to variables over which we have no direct control, such as innovations in competing products, changing corporate policies on the part of our customers, and competition from others in the industry. In addition, we are subject to changes in costs of supplies necessary to produce and distribute our products. The Company’s business is also subject to seasonal variations and international sales. Sales outside the United States potentially present additional risks such as political, social, and economic instability, as well as currency exchange rate fluctuations.

        The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors may emerge and it is not possible for our management to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any single factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

        The market price of our common stock has been and may remain volatile. In addition, the stock markets in general have recently experienced increased volatility. Factors such as quarter-to-quarter variations in revenues and earnings or losses and our failure to meet expectations could have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the price of our common stock can change for reasons unrelated to our performance. Due to our low market capitalization, the price of our common stock may also be affected by conditions such as a lack of analyst coverage and fewer potential investors.

        Forward-looking statements are based on management’s expectations as of the date made, and the Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any of these statements in the future. Actual future performance and results will differ and may differ materially from that contained in or suggested by forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.       Legal Proceedings:

Item 6.       Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K:

                  (A)     Exhibits:

                              31      Certifications of the CEO and CFO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                              32      Certifications of the CEO and CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  (B)     Reports on Form 8-K:

                               On January 13, 2004, we filed a current report on Form 8-K to announce our financial results for the quarter ended November 29, 2003.

                              On March 16, 2004, we filed a current report on Form 8-K announcing the appointment of Dr. Clayton Christensen to our Board of Directors.

                               On April 13, 2004, we filed a current report on Form 8-K to announce our financial results for the quarter ended February 28, 2004.

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert A. Whitman, certify that:

Date: April 13, 2004

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen D. Young, certify that:

Date: April 13, 2004

Exhibit 32

The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF FRANKLIN COVEY
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Franklin Covey Co. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

Dated: April 13, 2004

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF FRANKLIN COVEY
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Franklin Covey Co. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

Dated: April 13, 2004